Rent vs Buy Calculator
Renting or buying: total cost of each path over your actual time horizon
Renting or buying: total cost of each path over your actual time horizon
Rent-vs-buy is the most argued question in personal finance, and most arguments compare the wrong two numbers: this month's rent against this month's mortgage payment. The honest comparison is net cost over your actual time horizon — buying carries closing costs, maintenance, taxes and a 6–7% exit toll, but builds equity; renting is lighter and keeps your down payment invested and compounding. This calculator runs both ledgers month by month and names the cheaper path for your numbers.
| Buying costs | Buying credits | Renting costs | Renting credits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Down payment + ~3% closing costs; monthly P&I; ~2.6%/yr of value in taxes, insurance and maintenance; ~7% selling costs at exit | Home equity at exit (appreciation + principal paid) | Rent, growing every year | Down-payment money invested and compounding; any monthly savings vs owning, also invested |
Round-trip transaction costs (~10% of the home's value to buy and sell) are the reason time horizon dominates this decision:
| Ratio | Reading |
|---|---|
| Under 15 | Buying strongly favored (much of the Midwest and South) |
| 16–20 | Toss-up — run the full calculator |
| 21+ | Renting favored on pure math (coastal metros); buying there is a lifestyle/appreciation bet |
The defaults above ($380k price, $1,950 rent) are a ratio of 16.2 — right in the toss-up band, which is why the horizon input swings the verdict.
No more than mortgage interest, property tax, insurance and maintenance are — none of those build equity either. Rent buys housing plus flexibility; the question is which bundle is cheaper over your horizon, which is exactly what the calculator computes.
US homes have averaged 3–4% nominal annually over long periods, with brutal local variation. Use 3–3.5% as a neutral default and never justify a purchase by assuming boom-level appreciation — that's speculation wearing a budget.
It omits the mortgage-interest deduction deliberately: since the standard deduction roughly doubled, most owners don't itemize, so the deduction is worth $0 to them. If you itemize with a large mortgage, buying does slightly better than shown.
Real, and beyond arithmetic — stability, control, no landlord. The calculator's job is to price the difference so you know what the feeling costs; sometimes it's cheap, sometimes it's $100,000.
Higher rates raise buying's cost directly and usually cool appreciation; the calculator takes whatever rate you enter. If you expect to refinance later, run today's rate — refinancing is a future option, not a plan.
Yes — fold them into the maintenance percentage (an extra $300/mo on a $380k home ≈ +0.95%/yr). Condos typically justify a higher maintenance input than houses.
Yes — the entire simulation runs locally in your browser; nothing is uploaded.
There is no universal answer — there's your city's price-to-rent ratio, your horizon, and your discipline about investing the difference. Run your real numbers, stress them, and either way you'll make the housing decision the way it should be made: once, calmly, with the ledger in view.