Hobby Loss Rule Checker
Business or hobby? Score yourself on the IRS's nine factors before deducting losses
Business or hobby? Score yourself on the IRS's nine factors before deducting losses
The hobby-loss rule (Section 183) decides whether your money-losing venture is a business — losses deduct against your other income — or a hobby, where (post-2018) income is fully taxable while expenses deduct nothing. The IRS decides by a nine-factor profit-motive test plus a bright-line presumption: profit in 3 of the last 5 years and you're presumed a business. This checker turns the factors into an honest scorecard and tells you which side of the line your documentation currently supports.
| Business | Hobby (post-2018) | |
|---|---|---|
| Income | Taxable (minus expenses) | Fully taxable |
| Expenses | Fully deductible | Not deductible at all |
| Losses | Offset W-2 and other income | Nonexistent for tax purposes |
| Example: $8k revenue, $12k costs | −$4k loss deducts (≈$900–1,300 saved) | $8k added to taxable income (≈$1,800 owed) — a $3k swing |
The 2018 change made hobby status genuinely punitive — hobby sellers on Etsy/eBay owe tax on gross-ish income with no cost offsets (inventory cost of goods sold survives; nothing else does). The stakes are why the factors deserve twenty minutes.
Courts weigh them unevenly. The heavyweights in actual cases:
Profit in 3 of 5 consecutive years (2 of 7 for horses) shifts the burden to the IRS. Legitimate tactics around it: timing year-end invoices and purchases to engineer modest profitable years, electing Form 5213 to postpone the determination until five years exist (rarely wise — it flags you), and remembering the presumption cuts both ways: even without it, a well-papered profit motive wins cases; with it, sloppy books can still lose them.
It depends on your operation, not the platform: separate finances, real pricing strategy, and effort toward profit make a business; casual crafting that recovers some costs is a hobby. The checker's factor list IS the audit conversation.
Post-2018, only cost of goods sold (what the items you sold cost you) nets against sales. Fees, supplies beyond COGS, mileage, home office — all gone. It's the harshest cliff in small-business taxation.
It helps the history factor and counts toward 3-of-5. Serial $200 profits among $10k losses look engineered, though — courts notice token profits (factor 7). Meaningful profitability in some years is the pattern that persuades.
Schedule C losses offsetting high W-2 income, year after year, in pleasure-adjacent industries — the exact pattern DIF scoring flags. Three straight loss years against a $200k salary invites the letter.
An LLC alone changes nothing — courts say so explicitly. The same money spent on a bookkeeper, a business account and a written plan moves factor 1, which actually decides cases.
Contemporaneous books, a business plan with dated revisions, time logs, evidence of expertise-seeking (courses, consultants), and correspondence showing profit-seeking behavior (price negotiations, marketing pushes). Winners bring binders; losers bring passion.
Yes — your answers never leave the browser.
Answer the nine factors like an auditor, and the path is obvious: either invest the modest effort that makes your venture audit-proof, or enjoy the hobby and stop deducting it. Both are fine choices — the expensive one is drifting between them.